| |
Friendly with the Enemy
A
recent court decision regarding the legal rights of one of the American
citizens found living among the terrorists in Afghanistan reminded me
of the difficulties, legal and emotional, we still face in dealing with
those who would betray our country. But it also reminded me that in the
chronicles of our Judeo-Christian faith, we have a very similar story
featuring one of our greatest heroes, a man with a central place among
the pre-figurations of Christ. The story of David and the Philistines
is deeply troubling, but even more troubling is the lack of attention
it receives among churchgoers who rage against the American Taliban.
While we usually think of David as a man blessed by
God for his great faith, we often forget that just
before he becomes king, he lives among the enemy
Philistines for sixteen months, during which time he
so successfully convinces their king of his defection
that the king makes David his bodyguard for life.
David is even willing to fight against Israel for him,
so much so that when the king accepts his commandersí
request to forbid David to join them in battle, David
protests: "What have you found in your servantÖthat I
should not go and fight against the enemies of my lord
the king?" To which the king reassures him: "Öto me it
seems right that you should march out and in with me
in the campaign; for I have found nothing wrong in
youÖ." And so David returns to Philistia while the
Philistines go to war against Israel. And God never
seems to mind.
Of course, things are not exactly as they seem with
David: he is a skillful liar who knows he must remain
in the kingís good graces for an indeterminate time.
Just as he had earned the kingís trust by lying about
his "attacks" on Israel, here he is no doubt gambling
on the distrust of the kingís commanders to keep him
from actually having to fight his countrymen, who are
in reality his own subjects. Still, on the surface his
actions are scandalous, having the appearance of
treason against his native land. And Davidís behavior
cannot be explained simply as self-defense against
Saul, since Saul had made peace with him just prior to
his defection; although this peace would likely be
brief, David is not, at the moment he leaves Israel, a
hunted man.
David, therefore, deliberately allows himself to
appear guilty of high treason. Had he been captured by
Israeli soldiers and taken back to Saul, he would have
been in much the same situation as our American
Taliban: a native-born citizen found within enemy
camps during a war. His innocence would be hard to
prove. This episode is shocking, both for what happens
and for what doesnít (namely, condemnation). So why is
it getting so little attention among God-fearing,
Bible-believing Americans? Perhaps because it points
to two weaknesses in the American church: first, an
unwillingness to face the scandals of scripture, and
second, a refusal to accept that as Christians, we are
no longer citizens of any earthly nation.
The truth is, Davidís life is so scandalous that it
would offend us were he living today. From the worldís
perspective, not only is he Godís most socially
inappropriate choice to be king, he is also an usurper
to the throne whose faith in God costs innocent lives.
Nor does his faith make things easier for him as
monarch: he can never fully trust his ministers and
friends, and his family life is a mess. As the Psalms
make clear, David spent much of his life in anguish,
even after God established his throne. Yet we ignore
these harsh realities in favor of the rags-to-riches
story of a boy who becomes a great king through his
faith. Refusing to see how faith puts us at odds with
our world, we blindly hope that it will bring about
strong families, good political leadership, and a
peaceful society.
It is bad enough that we fail to acknowledge the way
Davidís life disproves many of our cherished
assumptions about the benefits of trusting God. But
the fact that we can be so enraged by Americans
working for our enemies while praising David as a
model proves how idolatrous our patriotism has become:
we can no longer see how this nation could be a snare
to us. Yet the story of David and the Philistines,
like that of Jeremiah with the Babylonians, should
teach us that there is no such thing as God "and"
country. At some point the two will be in tension, and
we must be ready to abandon our land for the sake of
our Lord. And that will mean that we will be
considered traitors.
I am not trying to evoke sympathy for the American
Taliban. My focus is solely upon us, upon our weird
revisions of scriptural narratives and upon our
unhealthy nationalism. Too often, we follow God only
so far as God brings order to our circumstances,
especially our nation. But this attitude fails to
comprehend the biblical message: God brings order not
to our circumstances but to our lives, which puts us
in conflict with everyone and everything around us. He
does all this in order to be the strength that gets us
through those conflicts and makes us a blessing to our
cultures. Yet we are no longer of those cultures. Like
David, we can live anywhere we choose, even among the
enemy, because no matter where we are, we are citizens
of Godís holy nation, cities set on a hill providing
light to all nations. We are no longer Americans, but
royalty in a foreign land.
Let us look again at David, and allow the messiness of
his own life, even his apparent treason, to provide us
a truer model of how the life of faith will look.
Perhaps then Christians will once again be Americaís
leaders, rather than its followers.
Copyright © 2003 by the author
All Rights Reserved
Home
| Our Mission | What
We Believe | FAQ | Issues
| Prayer Requests | TeleSeminars | Daily Devotions | Religion Dispatch Blog | Audio Whosoever | Whosoever Podcast | Resources
| Letters To The Editor | Reverent
Responses | Seeds of Hope | Reader
Survey | Bookstore
| Contact Us
|