Reverent Responses

Even Satan Believes in Jesus!
Neil Orts Responds


[Posted on September 23, 2000]

I stumbled upon your web page today. I was deeply saddened by what I read.

Dear Phil:

I'm sorry what you read saddened you. I hope you can come back to Whosoever and read some more and experience the struggles and the joys that are there as just another part of the human story.

Every human being enjoys the privilege of being loved by a kind Heavenly Father. He does not care who we are, or what we do, he loves us unconditionally. That much is very true.

It is good that we begin on some common ground!

To take it a step further and assert that he will save people "in sin" is mocking his very word. Satan believes in Jesus Christ! Will he be saved as well? I doubt it.

Who then can be saved? Just ignoring for the moment that we are in disagreement if homosexual orientation (and the acting upon it) is in itself a sin, I have to wonder who dies "outside sin." Does the man who dies while being an unrepentant gossip not get saved? Does the woman who dies holding a grudge not get saved? Does the person who has not sold everything, given it to the poor, and followed Jesus not saved. (I throw in that last one because that is what Jesus told the rich young man it took to be perfect. I personally know no one w

ho has sold everything to follow Jesus.) If anything, the Good News of Jesus is that even while we are in sin, Jesus comes to save us. Rather than mocking Jesus, I believe it is Jesus' message.

Whew. All that and I'm not even getting into the basic assumption we disagree about: That homosexuality is intrinsically sinful.

It is wrong to merely tell people what they wish to here and not have them take responsibility for their own actions.

Let me ask you this: Are all the preachers who are saying that homosexuality is wrong telling you that because that is what you want to hear? On the issue of homosexuality, I can go to any number of places to hear a variety of opinions and what I hear may or may not be what I want to hear. To say we flock to Whosoever to hear what we want to hear is to disregard a lot of serious struggle and pain and soul-searching. It also assumes that all glbt folk want to hear something uniform in its message. I've read a few things in Whosoever that I strongly disagree with. If I understand Candace correctly, she's purposefully published a few things that she disagrees with, just to display the spectrum of thought within the gay Christian community. We are not single-minded in all things, there is no unified gay agenda, and we differ on a variety of issues.

Believe me, I'm all for people taking responsibility for their actions. It's one of my pet peeves of the current culture that everything that happens is someone else's fault. I've more than once stopped a friend in his or her tirade and asked them, "Okay, so what was your part in this mess?" Usually they can find their part.

So, all I'm asking is that you not presume to know what I want to hear or what my sense of responsibility is.

I have several friends who are gay. They are great people. They also admit that they are gay because it is most comfortable for them, not because they were "born that way". They experimented at an early age, or were molested by an adult, and never gave it a second thought. They just kept seeking similar experiences going forward.

I can't speak for your friends. Their story is their own. What I do know from my life experience is that of the three boys with whom I experimented as a pre-teen, two are married to women and the third is inconclusive as to his sexuality. I also know men who experimented with women at an early age and are gay. (I only know one person who experienced molestation as a young girl and that wasn't by an adult. I therefore feel inadequate to comment on situations of molestations.) In other words, I don't believe early experimentation has that great of an impact on adult sexuality. It is what it is: experimentation.

I'm curious to know how many are "several" and if your several friends aren't just telling you what you want to hear -- or even if you're simply hearing what you want to hear. That sounds more accusatory than I mean it to. I'm just saying that when we have made up our minds about something, we don't always listen with the ear of discovery but with an ear to prove our own point. We all do it, from time to time. I'm doing it even now as I project my experience on a few words of what you've told us about your friends.

So, I leave you to take your friends' stories at their words. Just be aware that not every gay person's story is the same as theirs and we all ask a fair hearing.

If belief only precipitates salvation, the devil and all of his angels will enjoy the same benefits of all "believers". Being a believer involves more than just "believing". Those who hear the word must be doers of the word as well. It may be your belief that initiates or encourages the doing, but to believe only, profits you nothing.

I cannot argue with you there. I'm a poor Lutheran, but I disagree with Martin Luther on the letter of James, especially after reading a commentary on James by Elsa Tamez. There is an active component to faith.

Where we obviously disagree is on whether or not one's sexual orientation has anything to do with that active faith. From my point of view (and I've not always held it), sexual orientation is just another way of being. One straight friend of mine has called it "another type of normal." It's not a matter of morality in and of itself. All of my moral issues seem pretty common to all humanity, gay and straight.

I have little more to say to your letter. There are obviously some places where we share common ground. I suppose we'll have to trust in Jesus' grace to be sufficient to cover our differences.

Peace,

Neil